[media presentation below] GospelThink Saturday, July 8 MATTHEW 9:14-17 I give you some thoughts about fasting and my presence in your life. Prayerthoughts a. As we think of Jesus’s departure and his return on the final day, we are in that interim period now.  How do I fast?  Fasting can be more than fasting from food.  Do I fast from food, television, Internet, etc., by treating them with moderation in my life? b. Jesus gives a new meaning to fasting. It involves not the old idea of restraint, but the new idea of love of God. When I am asked to fast (by Church law), do I spend the time when I am fasting to turn to God in prayer? (This is the task of the meditation.) c. As I listen to the Lord speak of his death, I think of my own death.  As I study my life right now, am I preparing for my death by trying to correct my faults? d. The bridegroom, Jesus, is never taken away from us in the sense that the Lord is always with us. Do I acknowledge the Lord’s presence during the day as often as I should? e. Jesus’s approach to life is something new. How do I best describe the Lord’s law? f. New wine is poured into fresh wineskins. I must adjust my life to what the Lord wants. At this time in my life, what should I change the most according to Jesus’s law? g. My prayerthoughts….   Today, I will carry out letter b. Some Thoughts on the Liturgy  THE LAW OF JESUS  + A difficult concept for the Hebrew mind was Jesus’ insistence that the old law had to change          – here: nobody sews a new cloth—that is Jesus’ new law—on an old cloak, that is the Hebrew law          – the Hebrew law was sacred to the Hebrew mind                   – but Jesus was adamant that it had to change  + What had happened was that the old law was not effective any more          – in fact, in many ways, it was too easy          – it was easily compromised by clever people                   – like the Pharisees who knew the law inside and out, and made the law suit what they wanted                            – people who really did not concern themselves about what was right                   – they used the law to their advantage  + It is interesting, though that God still used those situations to bring about good from the evil          – as can be seen by the whole Esau/Jacob story of the book of Genesis          – in fact, Jacob tricked Esau in two ways in the book of Genesis                   – not only here with his mother Rebekah, getting the special blessing of the father that was so important to the Hebrew people                            – but also a little earlier in Genesis by tricking Esau into getting his birthright          – Jacob goes on to become a great patriarch, even though there was evil in the early part of his life                   – God brings good from evil  + But I think that the stress of the liturgy is the new law that Jesus talks of:          They pour new wine into fresh wineskins, and both are preserved.          – the new law, the law of Jesus is real                   – that is, what Jesus said and what he did becomes the law that we the followers of Jesus must follow                   – Jesus is the primary focus                   – who he was, why he did the things that he did                   – he is the new law, the one that we should study  + The problem comes when Christian people refuse to listen to what the law means in their lives          – they know what Jesus said and what he did                   – but they also know what their human nature wants and desires                            – and so, in a sense, they want the “old law”—that is, what they want—to govern their lives, and not what Jesus wants                                     – we don’t like Jesus’ doctrine of love of enemies, no revenge, and concern for the poor                                              – and so, we simply do not follow it  + Our task as Christian people is to really “taste” the new wine, the law of Jesus          – and put it into our wineskins, our lives. MEDIA PRESENTATION Movie: “The Lone Ranger” — beginning session REVENGE OR JUSTICE? The Gospel LUKE 9:51-56 When the days for his being taken up were fulfilled, Jesus resolutely determined to journey to Jerusalem, and he sent messengers ahead of him. On the way they entered a Samaritan village to prepare for his reception there, but they would not welcome him because the destination of his journey was Jerusalem. When the disciples James and John saw this they asked, “Lord, do you want us to call down fire from heaven to consume them?” Jesus turned and rebuked them, and they journeyed to another village.

Gospelthink: I rebuked James and John because they wanted revenge. I told them that a follower of mine cannot be interested in revenge.

If there were some type of unwritten rule for the latter 1800 Western United States, it may have been the thought of protection of self at whatever cost as one tried to settle in the territory. “Whatever cost” usually meant some type of revenge when things did not go well. Unfortunately, often things did not go well because of the greediness of the different characters involved. Into such a setting comes the person whom the fantasy world of American westerns knows as the Lone Ranger. John Reid, later to be known as the Lone Ranger according to the movie “The Lone Ranger,” was a young college-educated prosecutor who came into the West in the early 1870’s as a law-fearing man, as he called himself. He felt that if there was justice served, then there would be no need for revenge. His future companion, Comanche-born Tonto, himself a victim of violence, was convinced, as were so many, that revenge was the only justice in a land of violence. The Lone Ranger himself was to grapple with what justice meant, even as he felt the desire to be revengeful.

Jesus knew about the human tendency toward revenge, the desire to repay people in kind for some evil brought upon them. He worked with people in every circumstance imaginable for his time, and therefore he saw that people often lived their lives as more of a negative response to what others did to them. The Apostles that he chose were no different, even though Jesus had given them heavenly powers. Their human desire was to get back at the people who wronged them, to use the powers that they had to bring those who opposed them into submission. Jesus had to teach them, and therefore those who follow him, that revenge will never bring about justice. Such was the ideal of John Reid as he began his life in a country that lived by the creed of seeking revenge for wrongdoing. It was a difficult ideal to pursue as he began to interact with the evil people who wanted the new-found riches of the early Western United States. It seemed only just that the people who killed, who hurt, and generally did anything they wanted should be punished in some way. Reid was convinced that justice was the only answer, even though he and the good people around him were inclined toward revenge. Along with the idea of love of enemies and forgiving all, avoiding revenge may be the most difficult of the doctrines that Jesus taught. We live and work in a world in which revenge is presented often as a “right” to which we are entitled. We feel justified in “getting back” at those who have hurt us or our families. Modern media presents images of revenge that more or less give us “permission” to give to others “what they deserve.” It is important for Christians to study their lives in light of the Gospel of Jesus. Jesus’ primary doctrine was no doubt love of God and others, but it begins with a true desire to at least be just to everyone we meet.

PRAYER Good and gracious God, your Son gave us the ideal of avoiding revenge in his life, but it is a difficult doctrine to carry out. Give us the grace to truly understand the meaning of justice so that we can avoid revenge. Be with us, we pray.

+++++ GUIDE FOR CLASSROOM PRESENTATION AND PERSONAL ENRICHMENT Theme: We must become people dedicated to justice, especially when there is a strong desire for revenge. DISCUSSION QUESTIONS: (session: approximately 70 minutes) 1. What scene during this session is most striking and why? 2. In the Gospel, Jesus was going to Jerusalem to face what he had to do to redeem humankind. What is your understanding of Jesus’ redemption? (See Catechism of the Catholic Church, second edition, numbers 606-618.) 3. Just as in Jesus’ time, there still exists bitter hatred between different countries and races. What can you do as a Christian to take away some of this prejudice? 4. There are many examples of “revenge” in the world today. Discuss one example. 5. Some Christian commentators maintain that at times revenge can bring about justice. Do you agree and why or why not? 6. Early on, the “rule of the land” was the “death penalty,” the ultimate punishment of revenge enacted in a court of law. What is your feeling about the death penalty now? (See Catechism, number 2267.) 7. In your opinion, what are the most difficult “doctrines” of Jesus? 8. Is it true that modern media often presents “revenge” to be the way a person should act? Yes or no and why? 9. Analysis: the character of Latham Cole, rail magnate. What were the driving forces in his life? 10. Dialogue analysis: John Reid says he is a “law-fearing man” in contrast to a “God-fearing man.” What is the difference? 11. Analysis: the killing that takes place. In your opinion, do such scenes have an adverse effect on young people? Yes or no and why? 12. Dialogue analysis: Tonto replies that his only crime is being an Indian. Do you believe that there is still prejudice against the American Indian? Yes or no and why? 13. Analysis: the “Spirit” horse (later “Silver”). In your opinion, does God sometimes act through animals? Yes or no and why? 14. Analysis: Tonto’s custom of “giving to the dead” when he takes something from them. Why is it a good custom? 15. Analysis: the sin of prostitution. Even though it has been practiced throughout history, why is it wrong? (See Catechism, number 2355.)